Breaking

Battered Journalists Sue Military Police Commander, Attorney General

Top story
In their petition before the High Court Civil Division, the journalists note the respondents through their agents blocked them from covering Kyagulanyi who was delivering his petition on Human rights violation to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on February 17, 2021.
03 Mar 2021 16:00
Namakumbi and Nabakooza.

Audio 2

Four journalists have sued Lt. Col Napoleon Namanya, the Director of operations in the Military Police and the Attorney General for their recent attack while covering the former National Unity Platform-NUP Presidential candidate, Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu. They are John Cliff Wamala and Geoffrey Twesigye, both from NTV, Josephine Namakumbi from NBS TV and Shamim Nabakooza from Record TV. 

In their petition before the High Court Civil Division, the journalists note the respondents through their agents blocked them from covering Kyagulanyi who was delivering his petition on Human rights violation to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on February 17, 2021.


They argue that the conduct of the respondents prevented them from executing their work as expected. They want the court to hold the respondents held liable for human rights violations and misconduct of their juniors or subordinates.  In their evidence, the applicants implicate Lt. Col Namanya for commanding what they describe as a violent gang to assault them in the course of their duties.


In their affidavits, the applicants not that they are entitled to media freedom, freedom of expression, human dignity, and other fundamental human rights and freedoms enjoyed by persons in Uganda.  In his affidavit, John Cliff Wamala, says that he woke up motivated and spirited to carry on his work and set out like he always does for any other day conscious of the obligations he dearly holds close to his heart as a member of the fourth estate, whose duty he believes is meant to benefit the general public. 

He explains that upon arrival at Kololo where Kyagulanyi was supposed to deliver his petition, some people on his team were granted access as the soldiers reportedly directed journalists to converge in a place they referred to as a safe zone.  

"In the nick of time, a military pickup truck with men in security uniforms wielding guns, sticks, and batons emerged from the back of the so-called safe zone line. They dramatically hopped off the trucks and came surging towards us (Journalists). Sensing danger, I and other Journalists including the applicants reacted aptly and ran in the opposite direction,” says Wamala.  

He explains that despite this, the officers pursued them and beat them with sticks leaving nursing injuries and pain. Wamala, who sustained injuries on the head, appeared at court with stitches. Wamala says that they want the court to declare that the actions of the military officers to beat and disperse them in the course of their duties contravened their media freedom and freedom of expression and other rights enshrined in the Ugandan constitution.

 //Cue in: “He is the…

 

Cue out: …sanity to this”. //

 Luganda Audio by Wamala

//Cue in:  “Nsubira nti lino…

Cue out: …ngabakoze ebikolobelo”. //   

Through their lawyers led by Eron Kiiza, the journalists also want the government and Lt. Col Namanya to compensate them for the general and exemplary damages as well as costs of the suit. This is the third civil suit being lodged before the High Court in relation to the same matter. 

Human rights lawyer, Steven Kalali filed the first case against the government on behalf of the victims. The second was filed by the Uganda Journalists Association against the government and seven soldiers who are said to have assaulted the journalists. The court is yet to fix the cases for hearing.



The Chief of the Defense Forces General David Muhoozi has since apologized to the media and the public for the actions of his troops. The army released a statement recently indicating that the seven of the soldiers were sentenced to jail for a period ranging from 62 days to 90 days after being found guilty of conduct prejudicial to the image of the force.

Images 2

Keywords