Dr. Mary Goreti Nakabugo, the Executive Director Uwezo and the lead investigator in the assessment views these emotional responses as a positive aspect of the assessment process. She explains that such reactions can reveal discrepancies between parents' perceptions and their children's actual abilities, which may be masked by misleading school reports.
Over the past two weekends, Uwezo National Assessment teams have been collecting crucial data
that will shape the 2024 report in their "Are Our Children Learning?"
series. Emotions ran high among some parents
as they watched their children grapple with seemingly simple questions.
Despite
this, the children remained eager and responded to the voluntary questions
with enthusiasm, revealing the stark realities of their academic abilities. As
part of this assessment, children aged 4 to 16 from 20 households in each of 15
villages across 29 districts were given two standardized questions, regardless
of their school attendance.
In one village in Wakiso, the scene
was particularly heart-wrenching. A mother, visibly upset, watched as her
primary four children struggled with basic addition. Tears welled in her eyes as she
urged, "Fred, nusu binna bw'ogattako endala mukaaga ofuna
meka?" roughly translated to "Fred, what do you get if you add 400
and 600?"
Despite
her attempts to help, the more she intervened, the more confused her child
seemed to become. In a different household, a younger
child in primary one answered questions swiftly, much to the astonishment of
their parent. Yet, the older sibling, despite being in a higher class (senior one),
struggled with the same questions. This discrepancy in performance highlighted
the varied educational experiences within the same family.
Another parent, grappling with shock
and frustration, questioned whether his child was truly learning anything at
school. "These are simple questions. How can you not answer them?"
the parent lamented, his disbelief evident in their voice. This parent was on the
brink of losing his temper and nearly slapped the child.
However, the situation was diffused
by a calm and compassionate young female volunteer, who quickly stepped in to
defend the child. “He may have just forgotten the concept,” she gently
suggested. “It’s not a big deal; he’ll recall it.” The volunteer’s intervention
prevented several other children from facing similar outbursts across different
households.
In one instance, her reassuring words helped the child regain
composure and correctly answer a numeracy question. Despite this,
the child struggled with the story reading section, expressing that it was
difficult and not covered in their school curriculum.
Dr. Mary Goreti Nakabugo, the Executive
Director Uwezo and the lead investigator in the assessment views these
emotional responses as a positive aspect of the assessment process. She
explains that such reactions can reveal discrepancies between parents' perceptions
and their children's actual abilities, which may be masked by misleading school
reports.
Dr. Nakabugo adds that during the
assessment they added simple, proactive steps for parents, such as regularly
checking their children’s books, interacting with teachers outside of official
visiting days, and collaborating with other parents to stay informed and
involved.
//Cue in: “ “Tosobola kugatta
bino”...
Cue out...can support them.”//
Another key observation from our
reporter was the diverse range of parental reactions. Some parents demonstrated
a clear understanding of their children's strengths and weaknesses, whereas
others attributed their children's poor performance to ineffective schooling.
While some parents acknowledged that their children’s struggles were due to
skipping school or other factors, others were quick to criticize the school
system itself.
Meanwhile,
while many parents, particularly mothers, showed great interest in the assessment
and welcomed the enumerators into their homes with enthusiasm, misconceptions
about the assessment's purpose were widespread across many villages. Several
households hoped the assessment would lead to scholarships or bursaries for
their children.
Upon realizing that the assessment’s primary aim was to
evaluate educational progress rather than provide financial support, some
parents felt disappointed. Dr.
Nakabugo acknowledges that high expectations from parents are common. Based on
experience, she has learned that managing these expectations requires clear
communication and transparency about the assessment’s goals and benefits.
She
stresses that the assessment is not only intended to generate data for experts
but also to raise public awareness about the significance of children’s
education and to address broader educational issues.
//Cue
in; “And what they...
Cue
out...management.”//
Before
the household assessments on Saturdays and Sundays, volunteers visited
pre-selected schools on Friday, based on where most local children were
enrolled. While at schools, they collected data on teachers, enrollment,
textbooks, learners-to-teacher ratios, and feeding programs among others, using
interviews and verified other details through direct observation.
Scope
of Assessment Expanded
Dr. Nakabugo explains that while the
national assessment was initially conducted annually, it has since shifted to a
biennial or triennial schedule. She emphasizes that each time they carry out
the assessment, their goal is not only to evaluate literacy and numeracy but
also to review the entire education system to identify new issues that require
data.
Some elements are added or removed
based on these insights. The focus has expanded beyond just measuring basic
literacy and numeracy skills to include various factors that help understand
the underlying reasons for children's academic abilities or challenges.
Dr. Nakabugo notes that the
development of assessment tools involves extensive consultation with a
technical advisory committee. This committee includes representatives from
UBOS, NCDC, academia, the Ministry of Education, and other education
stakeholders, who frequently suggest new elements to be incorporated into the
assessment.
//Cue in: “The things we...
Cue out...the new items.”//
This
year, Uwezo added questions on school feeding, pregnancy, learner return
post-COVID-19, disability issues, corporal punishment, and parental involvement in
learning, among others.
Observers invited to
appreciate the data-collecting level
In the same breadth during the
conduct of the assessment, Uwezo allowed observers from the ministry of Education,
teachers’ unions, academia, local government, and media among others who went to
see how the exercise was conducted.
One notable participant who visited
several areas in Wakiso district was Professor Lutalo Bbosa, a seasoned
educationist. He emphasized that such assessments are crucial for the education
sector, as the data collected can significantly contribute to improving the
educational system.
“I believe these assessments are
fundamental. The insights gained from this data will help us understand where
we stand and identify areas for improvement. Only with accurate information can
we make informed decisions to enhance our educational system and ensure that
every child receives the quality education they deserve,” Professor Bbosa
remarked.
In an interview with our reporter,
Professor Bbosa criticized the government for failing to allocate sufficient
funds to research areas that are crucial for educational assessments. He
highlighted that data from these assessments are vital for informing
policymakers about the effectiveness of educational programs, guiding decisions
on resource allocation, policy adjustments, and program development.
Professor
Bbosa has served for years as the chairperson of UNEB’s National Assessment of
Progress in Education – NAPE report, which also is carried to determine the
levels of learners’ achievement in Numeracy and Literacy in English.
Filbert B. Baguma
General Secretary Uganda National Teachers Union (UNATU) was also in the
field to see the activity first hand. Baguma, observed that exercise not only
gives crucial opportunity for participating households to gain a clearer
understanding of their children's learning progress but also encourages
self-reflection among parents regarding their children's academic development.
“The
data serves as a mirror, reflecting the true state of educational progress.
This is essential for fostering a deeper understanding of educational needs and
areas for improvement. Despite the potential uncertainty about how the government
might utilize the data, the exercise helps bridge the gap between perceived and
actual learning outcomes,” he noted.
How Valuable Is the Generated
Data?
Dr. Nakabugo highlights the
immense value of the assessment data. Initially shared with the Ministry of
Education and national departments, it is crucial for planning and
decision-making. At the district level, the insights help schools pinpoint
areas that need more focus in their curricula.
She adds that recent reports
emphasize investing in early-grade learning to enhance outcomes, particularly
in numeracy and literacy. Using Uwezo data, the Ministry of Education, Finance,
and development partners have developed new programs and guided budget
allocations, gaining clear insights into educational needs.
//Cue in: “Literacy and numeracy...
Cue out...about learning.”//
With the
2024 assessment now complete at the data collection stage, the country awaits
results from this highly regarded research. The previous report which was released in 2021 showed a troubling trend: a
staggering 50.7 percent of children who were in primary three could not
identify letters of the alphabet and therefore were categorized as non-readers,
while 31.3 percent of the same group of learners could not attempt simple
numeracy tasks.
The
report also points to another big monster in the room is over-age learners.
According to the said report, the pandemic aggravated the over-age problem that
was already considerable. For example, 39 percent of P1 children surveyed were
aged eight years old, compared to 33 percent in 2018. The right age for
P1 is six years.