The February cabinet decision proposes a relocation and resettlement package of 10 Million shillings, 20 bags of cement and unspecified number of pieces of iron sheets for each of the households currently living in disputed Apaa Township.
Acholi chiefdom has joined Acholi Parliamentary group in
protesting the cabinet decision to compensate residents of disputed Apaa
Township in Amuru district.
The February cabinet decision proposes a relocation and resettlement package of
10 Million shillings, 20 bags of cement and unspecified number of pieces of
iron sheets for each of the households currently living in disputed Apaa
According to the leaked cabinet minute, the resettlement plan targets only 372
households which government confirmed to have lived in the disputed area
through the registration for the issuance of national identity cards.
Now, Acholi chiefdom says the cabinet plan only serves to confirm the long-held suspicion that government has never
been clean in handling the Apaa land crisis.
Ambrose Ola, the Prime Minister of Ker Kwaro Acholi, the Acholi Cultural
Institution says the proposed resettlement plan makes it glaring for everyone
to see that government has been handling the matter with dirty hands.
Ola says the move further lends credence to the widespread political
propositions that land disputes in the Acholi sub-region
are no longer separate from existential threats facing the Acholi ethnic group.
//Cue in: “Aware of the ongoing….
Cue out: “….contempt that it deserves”//
Ola says the chiefdom will seek constitutional interpretation of the existence
of public and former public land in Acholi as a measure to curtail government
high handedness in land issues in Acholi sub-region.
Ola says the chiefdom will then use the constitutional interpretation to
establish a customary land trust under which all land ownership interests in
Acholi sub-region will be vested.
Wang OO, an auxiliary policy-making organ
of Acholi chiefdom says it is sad that the Executive is proposing something
parallel to the positions on which it consulted residents through the Apaa
Presidential Mediation Committee chaired by Prime Minister Dr. Ruhakana
Rosalba Oywa, an official of Wang Oo says it is sad that the
government is not ashamed of disrupting the progress of post-conflict recovery it failed to protect lives and properties
during the brutal reign of terror of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).
//Cue in: “And we feel very sad…
Cue out: “…interests on the land”//
Robert Adongakullu, another official of Wang Oo says government is making it
hard for communities affected by land conflicts to believe that they will
survive the existing peace after surviving the Lord’s Resistance Army conflict.
//Cue in: “If we look at the people….
Cue out: “….coming on the north”//
Members of the Acholi Parliamentary group who leaked the cabinet proposal to
the Press equate the proposed cabinet decision to a declaration of genocide on
Lilly Adong, the Vice Chairperson of Acholi Parliamentary Group says failures
of government to prosecute perpetrators of violence which led to loss of lives
in Apaa Township is similar to a declaration of genocide on Acholi.
//Cue in: “How do we trust….
Cue out: “…do you term that?”//
MP Adong says government attempted to vindicate itself by polarizing Apaa land
conflict through making it appear ethnic between the Madi and the Acholi
//Cue in: “We have also come….
Cue out: “….cooperation between tribes”//
President Yoweri Museveni has always blamed the Apaa land conflict on political
leaders in the region saying they would like to profiteer from the confusion.
He accuses politicians of sowing seeds of confusion among the people.
Last year, the President instituted a 16-man committee under the leadership of
Prime Minister Dr. Ruhakana Rugunda to
consult affected residents on the best option for resolving the conflict which
dates back to 2012.
He proposed relocation and compensation of the affected residents, degazettement of part of the disputed 827
square kilometres or relocation to Madi
or Acholi districts.
The affected residents favored degazettement of the proposed conservation area
which has been gazetted and de-gazetted multiple times since the 1970s.