Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that all charges, or ongoing criminal trials, or pending trials, before the courts martial involving civilians must immediately cease and be transferred to the ordinary courts of law with competent jurisdiction.
The Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka
The Attorney General has written to Chief Justice
Alfonse Owiny-Dollo Chigamoy seeking guidance on the implementation of the Supreme
Court decision that banned the trial of Civilians in the General Court Martial.
Addressing Parliament on Tuesday, Kiwanuka indicated that the Directorate of Public Prosecutions (DPP) will work closely with the General Court Martial and the UPDF to take over the prosecution of criminal trials identified for transfer.
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that all charges, ongoing criminal trials, or
pending trials, before the courts-martial involving civilians, must immediately
cease and be transferred to the ordinary courts of law with competent
jurisdiction.
The Court also ruled that the judgment shall have no
retrospective effect on any conviction made, and sentences imposed, before
the date of this judgment; save where the conviction and sentence are being
challenged in a Court of law.
But Kiwanuka said that they have also written to the
Ministry of Defense and Veteran Affairs to commence consideration of the
recommendations of the Supreme Court decision with a view of introducing
amendments to the UPDF Act.
The Supreme Court
recommended establishing the General Court Martial (GCM)
as a division of the High Court, handling capital criminal cases involving both
military officers and civilians. Magistrates within the division would handle
offences falling under their jurisdiction.
Another recommendation is to limit the functions of Unit Disciplinary
Committees (UDCs) and Summary Trial Authorities (STAs) to handling strictly
disciplinary offences, with no power to impose imprisonment
sentences.
The Chief Justice also proposed utilizing the existing magistracy to handle
criminal cases, except disciplinary offences, committed in Uganda. Subordinate
military courts would handle cases at the level of Chief Magistrate's Courts.
Additionally, Owiny-Dollo recommended appointing civilians
with professional legal qualifications to serve as judicial officers in
subordinate military courts, with the advice of the Judicial Service
Commission. Other options include amending the Constitution to establish
superior courts within the military court system, providing for the High Court
to sit as a Court Martial, and making provisions in the UPDF Act for the trial
of civilians in military courts under limited circumstances.
Furthermore, Owiny-Dollo suggests making provisions in the
UPDF Act for appeals from military courts and tribunals, corresponding to
appeals in ordinary courts.
The Chief Justice emphasized that in
each of the options suggested, the jurisdiction of UDCs and STAs must be
limited to handling strictly disciplinary offences, with no power of detention
or imprisonment, as is the case with other disciplined forces such as the
Police and Prisons.
The Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka however indicates that as of now, the Court Martial
cannot sit to make any decisions.
Kiwanuka also advised the Uganda Prisons Authority to adhere to the process outlined and await further instructions regarding the detention of accused individuals who were previously facing trial in military court.
However, Kiwanuka faced criticism from the opposition Members of Parliament including Ssemuju Nganda, Jonathan Odur, Joel Ssenyonyi, Winifred Nuwagaba and Lawyer
Medard Lubega Sseggona the Busiro County MP who was the lead lawyer in this
case demanding for the immediate release of Civilians who have been undergoing
trial in the GCM.
In response, Kiryowa informed Sseggona that if he has facts
that the Court ordered for the release of civilians, he knows where to present such
facts, in courts of law).
He also informed the MPs that if they think his advice is
not right, they should extract a decree since the matter under
discussion has no timeline for complying with the decision.
On Saturday, President Museveni expressed disappointment with the Supreme Court judegment, saying that it was a setback for the country’s efforts to curb crime and protect national security.