In 2016, the former Masaka High Court Judge Flavian Zeija, sentenced Byakaye to 32 years prison sentence after he was convicted of sodomizing the 9-year-old boy, whom he intercepted at the Golf Course in Masaka city. On his sentencing, the trial High Court ruled that the convict committed a beastly act on the victim who is also minor, which qualified him to get a severe sentence to send a warning signal to other would-be offenders.
Court Of Appeal Justices Christopher Gashirabak, Hellen Obura, and Eva Luswata during a special criminal session in Masaka
The Court of Appeal has
enhanced a jail sentence for a sodomy convict to 33 years in prisons up from
the 32 initially granted. A panel of the Court Appeal comprising
Justices Hellen Obura, Christopher Gashirabake, and Eva Luswata on Wednesday
dismissed an appeal by Yakobo Byakaye alias Musolo,53 years, who sought to
challenge the prison sentence granted to him by Masaka High Court Judge.
In 2016, the former Masaka High Court Judge Flavian
Zeija, sentenced Byakaye to 32 years in prison after finding him guilty of sodomizing a 9-year-old boy, whom he intercepted at the Golf Course in
Masaka city. On his sentencing, the trial High Court ruled that the
convict committed a beastly act on the victim who is also minor, which
qualified him to get a severe sentence to send a warning signal to other
would-be offenders.
However, the convict through Joshua Naluswa, a
lawyer on state brief, appealed against the jail sentence, arguing that the
trial High Court judge was too harsh to him, to the extent that he did not
consider the 2 years he had spent on remand. The convict requested the Court of Appeal to set aside the initial
sentence and grant him a lenient penalty by taking into consideration his
advanced age and the period he spent to remand.
But the three Justices during their special
criminal session in Masaka dismissed the appeal and instead added the convict
an additional year on top of the initial 32 years jail sentence. In a
joint judgment read by Justice Christopher Gashirabake, the Court of Appeal
held that the convict committed a grave offense that left permanent injuries to the victim,
who may also not regain his full health.
Court ruled that the trial Judge examined the circumstances of the offense, but was a little lenient
while granting the sentence of 32 years, a punishment for typical defilement
offenders. The justices accordingly dismissed the appeal and extended the sentence, ruling that the convict deserved a serious punishment as
a way of isolating him from the boy, who suffered bodily and emotional torture
occasioned by the defilement.
The Court of Appeal has also upheld a
life imprisonment sentence for a 54-year-old father who was convicted for
defiling his twin daughter. Patrick Kaggwa, a resident of Rakai district
had appealed against a life imprisonment sentence granted to him by Masaka High
Court in 2011 after he was convicted for defiling his 12-year-old daughter.
The convicted had pleaded that the trial judge based his
judgment on hearsay and uncollaborated evidence from witnesses who were not sure
about the details of the offense. He also argued that the victim never testified in the court. However, the Court of Appeal Justices upheld the
sentence, which they held was based on substantial evidence
including a medical report that indicated the rapturing of the victim's sexual
organs.
The Justices noted that the convict committed a grave offense
when he abused his natural trust as a biological father to the victim. “The court heard that the victim was sickly and
was suffering from Tuberculosis and died a week after she made the report.
Nevertheless, there is evidence that the defilement was repeated, and most
likely done in the presence of the victim’s twin sister. The victim before
death had also intimidated that you could strangle her while abusing her, which
could have deteriorated her health condition,” the ruling reads in
part.