On Friday March 5th, 2021, the nine member panel of Supreme Court justice allowed Kyagulanyi to withdraw his presidential election petition in which he had sought to over the victory of the incumbent President, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.
The withdrawal of the petition by the
National Unity Platform-NUP presidential candidate, Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu
from the Supreme Court denied the country a renewed legal system, the Director
of Legal Services in the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party, Oscar
Kihika has observed.
On Friday, March 5th, 2021, the nine-member panel of the Supreme
Court justice allowed Kyagulanyi to withdraw his presidential election petition
in which he had sought to over the victory of the incumbent President, Yoweri
Kaguta Museveni. Kyagulanyi ran to court on February 1st, 2021 accusing the
Electoral Commission-EC of fraudulently declaring Museveni as the winner
of the January 14th elections with 58 percent of the total votes cast against
his 35 percent.
In his petition, Kyagulanyi accused Museveni of bribery, intimidation,
ballot stuffing and sponsoring violence, which resulted in arrests and death
of people during the election process. Kyagulanyi accused the Attorney General, who
was a respondent to suit of failure to implement the recommendations arising
from the previous Presidential Election Petitions aimed at improving the
electoral processes in the country. He asked the court to nullify Museveni's
victory and order for fresh elections.
However, Kyagulanyi later instructed his legal team to withdraw the petition
after losing two applications seeking to amend the petition and include fresh
evidence. Kyagulanyi also argued that his witnesses had been arrested, tortured
and intimidated by security agencies.
On Friday, a panel of nine Supreme Court Justices led by the Chief
Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo allowed Kyaulanyi to withdraw his petition. Addressing
journalists at the NRM Party Headquarters in Kampala on Sunday, Oscar Kihika, the NRM legal director, said the
country and the legal fraternity, in particular, have lost immensely because of
the withdrawal of the petition.
"Normally decisions arising from presidential election petitions are a
the reservoir of the development of the law because on top of being a public
interest suit, there are very many legal and technical points that are argued
by lawyers and the Supreme Court normally takes this opportunity to pronounce its self on many principles and in the process, new precedents are actually formed,”
He said that the country has been denied an opportunity of having renewed
jurisprudence arising out of the issues that had been raised in the election
//Cue in: “for example before…
Cue out:…denied an opportunity.”//
Kihika also said the general public has also missed the chance of unveiling of
Kyagulanyi’s falsehoods in the petition. He says that his team had evidence
that the petitioner had intentionally defied the set rules of the election and
made it look like he was persecuted and tendered in affidavits with forged
signatures among other issues.
//Cue in: “there were affidavits…
Cue out:…you missed out.”//
Kahika also alleged that Kyagulanyi’s case was full of contradictions and
that the vote-rigging video evidence tendered in had been forged since it was
captured two days after the election.
//Cue in: “as long as…
Cue out:…about electronic evidence.”//
However, Kyagulanyi’s lawyer, Anthony Wameli will not have any of this.
He has equally accused Museveni’s lawyers and the other respondents of foul
play. He questioned how Kihika accessed that evidence he is referring to yet
the court declined to receive the same.
//Cue in: “we have been…
Cue out:…videos were captured.”//
He insists that Kyagulanyi had a strong case but the circumstances in the Court
could not allow them to proceed with the case. He says that the allegations of
forgery are baseless.
//Cue in: “for him to…
Cue out:…allegations are baseless.”//
Wameli says that the withdrawal of the case has denied the country and court
overwhelming evidence that his client was seeking to present.
//Cue in: “We will have…
Cue out:…hold is suppressed.”//
A number of Supreme Court recommendations basing on previous presidential
election petitions since 2001 have formed part of the country’s electoral
reforms following their adoption by Parliament.