Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /usr/www/users/urnnet/a/story.php on line 43
Mabiriizi Lists 80 Grounds for Appeal Against ‘Age Limit' Judgment :: Uganda Radionetwork
Breaking

Mabiriizi Lists 80 Grounds for Appeal Against ‘Age Limit' Judgment

In his judgment, Justice Kakuru pointed out that out of a population of close to 40 million Ugandans, only 22 individuals, eight Government ministries, 15 commissions or agencies including the Rt. Hon Prime Minister in his official capacity, four political parties, the leader of the opposition Parliament and one District Local Government were able to give their views on the bill before the legal and parliamentary affairs committee of Parliament.
The Petitioner, Male Mabirizi

Audio 2

Male Mabiriizi, one of the petitioners who challenged the ‘age limit' Constitutional Amendment Act, has filed a notice of appeal challenging the verdict of the constitutional court.

The notice of appeal is filed a day after the Constitutional Court decision that upheld the amendment by parliament to lift the cap on the presidential age, which was initially limited to persons aged between 35 and 75.

Four of the five members of the Constitutional Court; Cheborion Barishaki, Elizabeth Musoke, Alphonse Owiny-Dollo and Remmy Kasule, upheld the amendment when they said that it did not contravene the Constitution; neither did it contravene parliament's rules of procedure. But Justice Kenneth Kakuru declared that the process was flawed and urged that the amendment Act is purged from the Constitution.

In his judgment, Justice Kakuru pointed out that out of a population of close to 40 million Ugandans, only 22 individuals, eight Government ministries, 15 commissions or agencies including the Rt. Hon Prime Minister in his official capacity, four political parties, the leader of the opposition Parliament and one District Local Government were able to give their views on the bill before the legal and parliamentary affairs committee of Parliament.

He stated that the rest appeared to be a collection of obscure and amorphous groups that include Fronasa Veterans, Uganda Association of uneducated persons, Kick Age limit out of the Constitution and others.

This evening Mabiriizi rushed to Court of Appeal, where he presented 80 reasons for challenging the verdict of the Constitutional Court. Part of the reasons he says that he was denied a right to a fair hearing, was discriminated in a manner that is not justifiable in a democratic society and was denied a chance to respond to the contribution of the Attorney General.

Mabiriizi contends that the Court did not decide the fate of the two affidavits of Keith Muhakanizi the Secretary to the Treasury and Gen David Muhoozi, the Commander of the Defense Forces, which allegedly contained hearsay. Mabiriizi adds that he was also denied a chance to cross-examine Muhoozi.

//Cue in: "But since I'm…

Cue out: …is a big thing".//

Mabiriizi after filing the notice of the Appeal rushed to the Supreme Court Registry amidst tight deadline to avail them with copies as the legal procedures require.  The procedures include the requirement to state all reasons for the appeal and inform the Supreme Court as soon as possible in instances where one is not appealing against the whole judgment of the Constitutional Court.

Although armed police personnel attempted to block his access to the Supreme Court, on grounds that he arrived beyond office time, Mabiriizi later succeeded after introducing himself and the motive for his ‘visit'.  He now wants the Court of Appeal to declare the entire law as null and void.

//Cue in: "But that is…

Cue out: …null and void".//            

Support us


Images 1

Entities

Keywords