Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /usr/www/users/urnnet/a/story.php on line 43 Retracing Uganda’s Education Reforms, 35-Years After the Kajubi Commission :: Uganda Radionetwork
The 1987–1989 Education Policy Review Commission, commonly referred to as the Kajubi Commission, was chaired by the late Professor William Ssenteza Kajubi, a renowned educationist at the time. Findings and Recommendations of the Kajubi Commission formed the basis of the 1992 Government White Paper, a guiding document from which future education policies and interventions could be developed.
The government has embarked on a process, to address the challenges
that have been stifling Uganda’s educational progress over the years.
As part of the process, the Education Policy Review Commission
has been put in place to inquire into the effectiveness and relevance of the
current education policy to improve outcomes for children in education. The
commission, headed by veteran politician Nuwe Amanya Mushega, is the fourth
such commission since Uganda’s independence in 1962.
The first was the 1963 Castle Commission, followed by the
1977 Kajubi Commission and the 1987 Kajubi Commission which was the basis of
the 1992 white paper. But as the overhaul
starts, we look back at a similar exercise that shaped the education
landscape 35-years ago.
Shortly after the National
Resistance Army-NRA captured power in 1986, the new government embarked on an
ambitious process to revamp the education system that was falling apart.
The 1987–1989 Education Policy
Review Commission, commonly referred to as the Kajubi Commission, was chaired by
the late Professor William Ssenteza Kajubi, a renowned educationist at the
time. Findings and Recommendations of the Kajubi Commission formed the basis of
the 1992 Government White Paper, a guiding document from which future education
policies and interventions could be developed.
Dr Yusuf Nsubuga, a former Director
of Basic and Secondary Education at the education ministry, recalls that the
system in place at that time had been largely influenced by colonialists who
focused on producing workers thus the 1963 Castle Commission which was focusing
much on numeracy and Literacy.
Chaired by Professor Edgar Bradshaw
Castle, the commission proposed, among others, the merging of primary and
junior secondary schools, and expanding girls’ education. Incidentally,
Ssenteza Kajubi was also a member of the Castle Commission.
//Cue in; “The Kajubi commission…
Cue out…system for us.”//
In April 1992, the government,
which largely accepted recommendations by the Kajubi Commission designed an
implementation plan that was to transform the education system with much focus
on the quality of learners.
For starters, the White Paper
talked about changing the education structure to give eight years at primary
(P.1 to P.8), reduce the time at O’ Level to three years (S.1 to S.3), two for
A ‘level (S.4 and S.5) before a learner moves to an institution of higher
"At the secondary level much
of the time in S.1 is wasted in the revision of previous courses, and that
courses are light in S.1 and S.2. Hence, the entire O’ Level programme can be
covered in three years instead of four without much loss...Government has found
these arguments quite convincing, in support of the proposed changes in the
structure of education," the government white paper reads in part.
Primary education was to be
divided into two; lower primary (P.1 to P.4) and upper primary (P.5 to P.8). Dr
Nsubuga says having more years at the primary level was intended to increase
the age at which one is expected to leave this level of education and allow
sufficient time for teaching vocational subjects in primary schools.
//Cue in; “I Think those…
Cue out…in three years.”//
Although Prof Kajubi’s commission
had recommended pre-vocational skills at the primary level, the cabinet
stretched this recommendation and declared full vocational studies which would
be compulsory and measurable for every learner. The recommendation on vocation
studies at the primary level was looking to answer a question which,
unfortunately, is yet to be answered to date: What can a P.7 graduate do?
"Many students have no
opportunity for further education after P.7, and they are also so young at the
age of 13 to engage in productive or socially useful activity and be able to
stand on their own within a difficult social-economic situation. Such students
joining the world of work after P.7 are not equipped with technical and
managerial skills for gainful employment,” the government White Paper reads.
According to the implementation
plan, the government had to vocationalise primary education in 1992 starting
with a few vocational subjects that were already being taught in schools
including handicrafts, among others, also effecting changes in the structure of
education by 1994.
But Brighton Barugahare, a Principal
Policy Analyst at the education ministry, says that legislators at the time
opposed the change of the education structure making the issue political and
soon the government quietly abandoned it.
//Cue in; “And the white….
Cue out…they say why?”//
Besides the political aspect,
Barugahare adds that there were no resources to have the additional
infrastructure and fully implement 'vocationalisation' in all schools across the
Issa Matovu, an Educationist,
notes that the government expected and planned beyond its
potential. Matovu adds that, from day
one, the government was bound to fail as they could not implement vocational
education in primary schools.
//Cue in; “And that is…
Cue out…have the
Although the government failed to
implement skills in primary school, the curriculum that was designed tried to
introduce vocational occupations with Home Economics, Music, Dance and Drama,
Art and Design, and Physical Education among others. But these too were
Dr Nsubuga says that many
Ugandans, including the elite and some teachers, are not aware that the current
primary school curriculum has more learning areas than Mathematics, English,
Science, and social studies.
"A few who teach the other
part of the curriculum, and the practical bit of it offer it up to primary
three and drop them to focus on what they call core subjects which focus on
theory and in the end, we are still producing primary seven graduates who
literally cannot add value to themselves and the community," he says.
Framers of the government white
paper had also anticipated this scenario as the education system had been
dominated by examination at all stages without any provision for assessment of
other objectives of the curricula such as promotion of moral values, practical
skills, and cultural activities.
The white paper had recommended
continuous assessment with daily tests contributing at least 20 per cent and
staggering of end of cycle examinations with some subjects done earlier in P.6,
P.7, and finally P.8. However, this is yet to be achieved.
In secondary, the white paper
recommended the establishment of comprehensive secondary schools which would offer
a multi-purpose curriculum. Dr Nsubuga says that he was at the helm of
achieving this objective but their efforts were pulled down by politics,
people's mindset and lack of financial and human resources.
As the Commissioner in Charge of
Secondary Education, Nsubuga notes that with limited resources they had set out
to start implementation in 32 traditional schools where they built
laboratories, workshops and delivered equipment worth billions of funds. However,
most of these were left to waste and, before long, vocationalisation and making
secondary school comprehensive suffered a natural death.
//Cue in; “I was at…
Cue out…not majorly used.”//
28 years later, in
2020, the National Curriculum Development Centre came up with a new
multi-purpose lower secondary curriculum looking at academic and vocational
occupational subjects. However, its implementation is still a tug-of-war as
schools were not prepared for the curriculum before it was rolled out.
Amidst the many policy reforms, Uganda’s
education sector still faces many challenges, the biggest being financing. For
instance, the National Planning Authority states that education expenditure
from the national budget has been on the decline or stagnant in the range of
10-12 per cent compared to 22 per cent in the 2001/2002 financial year.
Monica Abenakyo Monge, a Veteran
teacher, says that with all the challenges, the government was able to score on
the provision of free primary and post-primary education which has given a wider
number of learners a chance to access education.
//Cue in; “And the government has…
Cue out…to school.”//
The Uganda Government introduced
Universal Primary Education (UPE) in 1997 and Universal Post-Primary Education
and Training (UPPET) 10-years later. Monge says that after achieving universal
education, all efforts should be diverted to ensure that the education provided
is of high quality.
//Cue in; “But then what…
Cue out…be relevant.”//
Matovu says that besides free
education, there are many other achievements that came as a result of the
Kajubi Commission. These include improving teacher education, teacher-pupil
ratio, infrastructure, provision of instructional materials and streamlining
higher education. He, however, notes
that there is a need to reset the education system through an honest discussion
on the critical matters that are hurting the system.
//Cue in; “We have registered…
Cue out…of the country.”//
Abbey Ssemuwemba, a concerned
Ugandan, says that for the twenty years’ learners spend in the education
system, they are subjected to theory, and meaningless certificates without any
skill. “Imagine if we have compulsory
skills development programmes in high school where our kids are taught. That
would also help to identify kids who are gifted in other areas. Not this one
size fits all math, literacy and endless theory,” Ssemuwemba posted in one of
the social media groups.